Conference Statistics

South Atlantic Team Report

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Patt	Pcomp	PaPct	Int	IntPct	Yds	Ydsatt	Tds	TdPct	Rating	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Newberry	10	258	128	49.61	11	4.26	1627	6.31	10	3.88	106.84	6	4	0	28
2	Carson-Newman	11	367	190	51.77	14	3.81	2386	6.50	15	4.09	112.27	7	4	0	39
3	Wingate	11	246	137	55.69	7	2.85	1715	6.97	10	4.07	121.98	8	3	0	69
4	Catawba	10	221	109	49.32	7	3.17	1610	7.29	13	5.88	123.57	6	4	0	73
5	Brevard	10	273	160	58.61	8	2.93	1813	6.64	14	5.13	125.45	1	9	0	81
6	Tusculum	13	366	204	55.74	10	2.73	2685	7.34	20	5.46	129.89	9	4	0	97
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	280	132	47.14	10	3.57	2243	8.01	21	7.50	132.00	3	8	0	106
8	Mars Hill	11	246	132	53.66	11	4.47	1935	7.87	25	10.16	144.37	7	4	0	137

FUMBLES RECOVERED

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Fumbles Recovered
1	Tusculum	19
2	Mars Hill	17
3	Carson-Newman	13
4	Brevard	12
5	Newberry	11
5	Wingate	11
7	Catawba	8
8	Lenoir-Rhyne	4

FUMBLES LOST

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Fumbles Lost
1	Newberry	6
2	Wingate	9
3	Catawba	10
4	Brevard	11
5	Mars Hill	12
6	Tusculum	14
7	Carson-Newman	24
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	24

KICKOFF RETURNS

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Games	Kret	Yds	Tds	Avg	Wins	Losses	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Wingate	11	51	1344	2	26.35	8	3	0	2
2	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	58	1400	0	24.14	3	8	0	14
3	Mars Hill	11	54	1255	1	23.24	7	4	0	20
4	Carson-Newman	11	39	833	1	21.36	7	4	0	39
5	Newberry	10	34	709	0	20.85	6	4	0	45
6	Brevard	10	50	1031	0	20.62	1	9	0	47
7	Tusculum	13	48	891	0	18.56	9	4	0	101
8	Catawba	10	41	758	0	18.49	6	4	0	103

NET PUNTING

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Punts	Avg	PuntRet	RetYds	Touchbacks	NetAvg	TotYds	Wins	Losses	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Tusculum	52	42.69	22	305	4	35.29	2220	9	4	0	17
2	Carson-Newman	42	37.55	11	86	2	34.55	1577	7	4	0	25
3	Wingate	40	37.58	16	94	2	34.23	1503	8	3	0	31
4	Brevard	55	37.35	21	124	4	33.64	2054	1	9	0	40
5	Newberry	51	38.67	20	140	6	33.57	1972	6	4	0	44
6	Mars Hill	53	33.00	13	91	0	31.28	1749	7	4	0	82
7	Catawba	54	31.04	8	63	4	28.39	1676	6	4	0	135
8	Lenoir-Rhyne	40	34.43	13	186	4	27.78	1377	3	8	0	138

PASSING OFFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Patt	Pcomp	Int	PaPct	Yds	Ydsatt	Tds	YdsGm	IntPct	YdsCmp	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Tusculum	13	523	309	15	59.08	4179	7.99	37	321.46	2.87	13.52	9	4	0	7
2	Wingate	11	379	218	11	57.52	2622	6.92	25	238.36	2.90	12.03	8	3	0	43
3	Newberry	10	261	157	12	60.15	1999	7.66	14	199.90	4.60	12.73	6	4	0	77
4	Catawba	10	258	134	7	51.94	1972	7.64	20	197.20	2.71	14.72	6	4	0	82
5	Mars Hill	11	247	121	11	48.99	2130	8.62	18	193.64	4.45	17.60	7	4	0	86
6	Carson-Newman	11	178	97	6	54.49	1772	9.96	16	161.09	3.37	18.27	7	4	0	113
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	136	65	6	47.79	1016	7.47	5	92.36	4.41	15.63	3	8	0	145
8	Brevard	10	159	73	11	45.91	724	4.55	7	72.40	6.92	9.92	1	9	0	148

PASS DEFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Patt	Pcomp	PaPct	YdsCmp	Int	IntPct	Yds	Ydsatt	Tds	YdsGm	Cm	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Wingate	11	246	137	55.69	12.52	7	2.85	1715	6.97	10	155.91	1	8	3	0	9
2	Catawba	10	221	109	49.32	14.77	7	3.17	1610	7.29	13	161.00	1	6	4	0	12
3	Newberry	10	258	128	49.61	12.71	11	4.26	1627	6.31	10	162.70	0	6	4	0	17
4	Mars Hill	11	246	132	53.66	14.66	11	4.47	1935	7.87	25	175.91	1	7	4	0	36
5	Brevard	10	273	160	58.61	11.33	8	2.93	1813	6.64	14	181.30	1	1	9	0	41
6	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	280	132	47.14	16.99	10	3.57	2243	8.01	21	203.91	1	3	8	0	79
7	Tusculum	13	366	204	55.74	13.16	10	2.73	2685	7.34	20	206.54	1	9	4	0	88
8	Carson-Newman	11	367	190	51.77	12.56	14	3.81	2386	6.50	15	216.91	2	7	4	0	101

PASSING EFFICIENCY

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Patt	Pcomp	PaPct	Int	IntPct	Yds	Ydsatt	Tds	TdPct	Rating	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Carson-Newman	11	178	97	54.49	6	3.37	1772	9.96	16	8.99	161.04	7	4	0	6
2	Tusculum	13	523	309	59.08	15	2.87	4179	7.99	37	7.07	143.83	9	4	0	29
3	Mars Hill	11	247	121	48.99	11	4.45	2130	8.62	18	7.29	136.58	7	4	0	40
4	Catawba	10	258	134	51.94	7	2.71	1972	7.64	20	7.75	136.26	6	4	0	41
5	Newberry	10	261	157	60.15	12	4.60	1999	7.66	14	5.36	133.04	6	4	0	51
6	Wingate	11	379	218	57.52	11	2.90	2622	6.92	25	6.60	131.58	8	3	0	52
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	136	65	47.79	6	4.41	1016	7.47	5	3.68	113.86	3	8	0	90
8	Brevard	10	159	73	45.91	11	6.92	724	4.55	7	4.40	84.84	1	9	0	141

PASSES INTERCEPTED

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Passes Intercepted
1	Carson-Newman	14
2	Mars Hill	11
2	Newberry	11
4	Tusculum	10
4	Lenoir-Rhyne	10
6	Brevard	8
7	Wingate	7
7	Catawba	7

PUNT RETURNS

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Games	Ret	Yds	Tds	Avg	Wins	Losses	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	22	247	0	11.23	3	8	0	38
2	Carson-Newman	11	20	203	1	10.15	7	4	0	58
3	Wingate	11	28	245	1	8.75	8	3	0	86
4	Tusculum	13	11	92	0	8.36	9	4	0	95
5	Mars Hill	11	17	134	0	7.88	7	4	0	102
6	Brevard	10	12	83	0	6.92	1	9	0	120
7	Newberry	10	23	124	0	5.39	6	4	0	130
8	Catawba	10	22	108	1	4.91	6	4	0	135

RUSHING OFFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Carries	Net	Avg	Tds	YdsGm	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Carson-Newman	11	519	3420	6.59	44	310.91	7	4	0	1
2	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	613	2851	4.65	31	259.18	3	8	0	5
3	Mars Hill	11	475	2034	4.28	27	184.91	7	4	0	35
4	Catawba	10	391	1843	4.71	17	184.30	6	4	0	37
5	Wingate	11	381	1917	5.03	19	174.27	8	3	0	45
6	Brevard	10	426	1600	3.76	12	160.00	1	9	0	59
7	Newberry	10	371	1459	3.93	15	145.90	6	4	0	72
8	Tusculum	13	394	1609	4.08	23	123.77	9	4	0	93

RUSHING DEFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Carries	Net	Avg	Tds	YdsGm	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Catawba	10	377	1332	3.53	14	133.20	6	4	0	59
2	Carson-Newman	11	410	1556	3.80	17	141.45	7	4	0	74
3	Newberry	10	409	1663	4.07	14	166.30	6	4	0	105
4	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	389	1984	5.10	23	180.36	3	8	0	123
5	Brevard	10	382	1818	4.76	25	181.80	1	9	0	124
6	Mars Hill	11	438	2025	4.62	19	184.09	7	4	0	125
7	Wingate	11	464	2027	4.37	24	184.27	8	3	0	127
8	Tusculum	13	573	2398	4.18	28	184.46	9	4	0	128

SCORING DEFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Points	PtsGm	Tds	Kxp	Oxp	Dkxp	Doxp	Fg	Sf	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Newberry	10	183	18.30	25	22	0	0	0	3	1	6	4	0	21
2	Catawba	10	213	21.30	29	23	1	1	0	4	0	6	4	0	39
3	Carson-Newman	11	268	24.36	34	28	3	0	0	10	0	7	4	0	59
4	Wingate	11	273	24.82	36	27	2	1	0	8	0	8	3	0	63
5	Tusculum	13	350	26.92	48	36	1	0	0	8	0	9	4	0	87
6	Mars Hill	11	329	29.91	46	39	1	0	0	4	0	7	4	0	108
7	Brevard	10	310	31.00	41	33	2	0	0	9	0	1	9	0	113
8	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	352	32.00	47	39	2	0	0	9	0	3	8	0	118

SCORING OFFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Yds	Tds	Points	Avg	Kxp	Oxp	Dkxp	Doxp	Fg	Sf	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Carson-Newman	11	5192	64	447	40.64	55	1	0	0	2	0	7	4	0	6
2	Tusculum	13	5788	62	452	34.77	51	0	0	0	9	1	9	4	0	21
3	Wingate	11	4539	48	353	32.09	35	3	0	0	8	0	8	3	0	36
4	Mars Hill	11	4164	46	341	31.00	42	1	0	0	7	0	7	4	0	42
5	Catawba	10	3815	40	292	29.20	30	2	1	0	4	2	6	4	0	55
6	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	3867	36	276	25.09	26	2	0	0	10	0	3	8	0	73
7	Newberry	10	3458	32	246	24.60	22	2	1	0	8	1	6	4	0	78
8	Brevard	10	2324	19	136	13.60	16	0	0	0	2	0	1	9	0	140

TOTAL DEFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Avg	Plays	Yds	Tds	YdsGm	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Catawba	10	4.92	598	2942	29	294.20	6	4	0	23
2	Newberry	10	4.93	667	3290	25	329.00	6	4	0	55
3	Wingate	11	5.27	710	3742	36	340.18	8	3	0	61
4	Carson-Newman	11	5.07	777	3942	34	358.36	7	4	0	89
5	Mars Hill	11	5.79	684	3960	46	360.00	7	4	0	91
6	Brevard	10	5.54	655	3631	41	363.10	1	9	0	95
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	6.32	669	4227	47	384.27	3	8	0	110
8	Tusculum	13	5.41	939	5083	48	391.00	9	4	0	115

TOTAL OFFENSE

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	Plays	Yds	Avg	Tds	YdsGm	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Carson-Newman	11	697	5192	7.45	64	472.00	7	4	0	5
2	Tusculum	13	917	5788	6.31	62	445.23	9	4	0	16
3	Wingate	11	760	4539	5.97	48	412.64	8	3	0	34
4	Catawba	10	649	3815	5.88	40	381.50	6	4	0	47
5	Mars Hill	11	722	4164	5.77	46	378.55	7	4	0	52
6	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	749	3867	5.16	36	351.55	3	8	0	72
7	Newberry	10	632	3458	5.47	32	345.80	6	4	0	75
8	Brevard	10	585	2324	3.97	19	232.40	1	9	0	140

TURNOVERS GAINED

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Turnovers Gained
1	Tusculum	29
2	Mars Hill	28
3	Carson-Newman	27
4	Newberry	22
5	Brevard	20
6	Wingate	18
7	Catawba	15
8	Lenoir-Rhyne	14

TURNOVERS LOST

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Turnovers Lost
1	Catawba	17
2	Newberry	18
3	Wingate	20
4	Brevard	22
5	Mars Hill	23
6	Tusculum	29
7	Carson-Newman	30
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	30

TURNOVER MARGIN

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Gm	FumGn	IntGn	Gtotal	Fumls	Intls	Ltotal	Margin	Win	Loss	Ties	Natl Rank
1	Mars Hill	11	17	11	28	12	11	23	.45	7	4	0	39
2	Newberry	10	11	11	22	6	12	18	.40	6	4	0	43
3	Tusculum	13	19	10	29	14	15	29	.00	9	4	0	68
4	Wingate	11	11	7	18	9	11	20	-.18	8	3	0	83
5	Catawba	10	8	7	15	10	7	17	-.20	6	4	0	88
5	Brevard	10	12	8	20	11	11	22	-.20	1	9	0	88
7	Carson-Newman	11	13	14	27	24	6	30	-.27	7	4	0	94
8	Lenoir-Rhyne	11	4	10	14	24	6	30	-1.45	3	8	0	142

SACKS

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Sacks
1	Catawba	2.8
2	Newberry	2.5
3	Tusculum	2.46
4	Mars Hill	2.36
4	Wingate	2.36
6	Carson-Newman	1.91
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	1.55
8	Brevard	.9

TACKLES FOR LOSS

Year: 2008

Thru: 12/27/08

Rank	Name	Solo	Assisted	Total	Yards	PG
1	Catawba	70	37	88.5	322	8.85
2	Carson-Newman	68	44	90	362	8.18
3	Tusculum	66	55	93.5	359	7.19
4	Newberry	55	24	67	266	6.7
5	Wingate	40	59	69.5	319	6.32
6	Mars Hill	55	17	63.5	248	5.77
7	Lenoir-Rhyne	39	32	55	206	5
8	Brevard	22	30	37	119	3.7