Navigation: Football Statistics Home  »   » 
Temple (5 - 2)
Thru:
Schedules/Rankings Roster/Player Stats Offense by Category Defense by Category Spl Teams All Offense All Defense Game by Game

2011 SCHEDULE AND RESULTS 5-2  W-2
Mid-American Conference Record: 3-1
Thu 09/01/2011 VILLANOVA * 42 - 7 W
Sat 09/10/2011 @ Akron * 41 - 3 W
Sat 09/17/2011 PENN ST. 10 - 14 L
Sat 09/24/2011 @ Maryland 38 - 7 W
Sat 10/01/2011 TOLEDO 13 - 36 L
Sat 10/08/2011 @ Ball St. 42 - 0 W
Sat 10/15/2011 BUFFALO 34 - 0 W
Sat 10/22/2011 @ Bowling Green
Wed 11/02/2011 @ Ohio *
Wed 11/09/2011 MIAMI (OH) *
Sat 11/19/2011 ARMY
Fri 11/25/2011 KENT ST. *
Sat 12/17/2011 @ Wyoming
HOME GAME IN CAPS * Night Game ^ Neutral Site
OT Overtime Game
 
TEAM RANKINGS
120 teams ranked in Football Bowl Subdivision
13 teams ranked in the Mid-American Conference
 
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Mid-American
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 8 257.00 Army 361.33 1 Temple 257.00
Passing Offense 110 142.86 Houston 435.50 11 Western Mich. 297.67
Total Offense 59 399.86 Houston 603.67 6 Northern Ill. 482.71
Scoring Offense 44 31.43 Wisconsin 50.17 4 Northern Ill. 39.57
Rushing Defense 10 87.14 Alabama 38.14 1 Temple 87.14
Pass Efficiency Defense 7 97.07 Michigan St. 84.35 1 Temple 97.07
Total Defense 5 255.43 Alabama 184.14 1 Temple 255.43
Scoring Defense 2 9.57 Alabama 7.00 1 Temple 9.57
Net Punting 11 40.65 UTEP 44.09 2 Bowling Green 42.81
Punt Returns 22 12.46 Ole Miss 31.71 2 Toledo 15.64
Kickoff Returns 1 29.60 Temple 29.60 1 Temple 29.60
Turnover Margin 31 .57 Rutgers 2.17 2 Toledo 1.43
Pass Defense 9 168.29 Michigan St. 119.17 1 Temple 168.29
Passing Efficiency 57 135.38 Baylor 206.86 6 Toledo 150.64
Sacks 18 2.86 Texas A&M 4.33 1 Temple 2.86
Tackles For Loss T-63 5.71 Marshall 9.57 7 Miami (OH) 8.00
Sacks Allowed 35 1.43 Stanford .33 5 Northern Ill. .71
T=tied at this ranking


PLAYER RANKINGS
Player must have played in 75% of team's games
Summary of the top 100 national leaders and top 25 conference leaders
15 categories ranked
 
Category Player National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Mid-American
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Bernard Pierce 8 120.57 James (Oregon) 170.40 1 Pierce (Temple) 120.57
  Matt Brown 97 63.29    9   
Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) Chester Stewart   149.29 Wilson (Wisconsin) 210.93 4 Dantin (Toledo) 152.32
Total Offense Chester Stewart   122.17 Keenum (Houston) 388.83 13 Harnish (Northern Ill.) 316.86
  Bernard Pierce   120.57    14   
  Matt Brown   63.29    22   
  Mike Gerardi   56.14    25   
Receptions Per Game     White (Western Mich.) 11.17   White (Western Mich.) 11.17
Receiving Yards Per Game Evan Rodriguez   40.14 Allen (California) 138.00 T-19 White (Western Mich.) 133.83
  Rod Streater   31.86    23   
Interceptions Justin Gildea T-31 .43 Amerson (North Carolina St.) 1.00 T-1 Addae (Central Mich.) .43
  Kevin Kroboth   .29    T-7   
  Kee-ayre Griffin   .17    T-15   
  Vaughn Carraway   .14    T-25   
  Ahkeem Smith   .14    T-25   
Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game)     Cowan (Idaho) 47.92   Schmiedebusch (Bowling Green) 46.34
Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) Matt Brown 21 10.60 Abbrederis (Wisconsin) 22.75 3 White (Western Mich.) 16.78
Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) Matt Brown 15 28.08 Whittaker (Texas) 46.50 2 Gates (Bowling Green) 29.83
Field Goals Brandon McManus T-54 1.14 Sturgis (Florida) 2.14 5 Sims (Northern Ill.) 1.86
Scoring Bernard Pierce 2 14.57 Ball (Wisconsin) 17.00 1 Pierce (Temple) 14.57
  Brandon McManus T-75 7.43    7   
All-Purpose Runners Bernard Pierce 51 128.00 James (Oregon) 229.60 4 Page (Toledo) 181.14
  Matt Brown 53 127.71    5   
Sacks Tahir Whitehead T-67 .57 Mercilus (Illinois) 1.43 T-3 Bishop (Western Mich.) .67
  Adrian Robinson T-67 .57    T-3   
  Ahkeem Smith   .29    T-20   
  Morkeith Brown   .29    T-20   
Tackles Stephen Johnson T-68 8.29 Kuechly (Boston College) 16.50 T-6 Wagner (Akron) 13.50
Tackles For Loss Tahir Whitehead T-20 1.43 Curry (Marshall) 2.43 T-2 Mack (Buffalo) 1.71
  Adrian Robinson   .86    18   
T=tied at this ranking