Navigation: Football Statistics Home  »   » 
PDF
Print this page 		Michigan St. (9 - 4 - 0)
Thru:
Menu: Schedules/Rankings Roster/Player Stats Offense by Category Defense by Category Spl Teams All Offense All Defense Game by Game

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS 9-4-0 L-2
Big Ten Conference Record: 6-2-0
Sat 08/30/2008 @ California 31 - 38 L
Sat 09/06/2008 EASTERN MICH. 42 - 10 W
Sat 09/13/2008 FLA. ATLANTIC 17 - 0 W
Sat 09/20/2008 NOTRE DAME 23 - 7 W
Sat 09/27/2008 @ Indiana 42 - 29 W
Sat 10/04/2008 IOWA 16 - 13 W
Sat 10/11/2008 @ Northwestern 37 - 20 W
Sat 10/18/2008 OHIO ST. 7 - 45 L
Sat 10/25/2008 @ Michigan 35 - 21 W
Sat 11/01/2008 WISCONSIN 25 - 24 W
Sat 11/08/2008 PURDUE 21 - 7 W
Sat 11/22/2008 @ Penn St. 18 - 49 L
Thu 01/01/2009 GEORGIA ^ 12 - 24 L
HOME GAME IN CAPS * Night Game ^ Neutral Site
OT Overtime Game
 
TEAM RANKINGS
119 teams ranked in Football Bowl Subdivision
11 teams ranked in the Big Ten Conference
 
Category National
Rank		 Actual National
Leader		 Actual Conf
Rank		 Big Ten
Conference Leader		 Actual
Rushing Offense 77 130.15 Navy 292.38 9 Wisconsin 211.15
Passing Offense 62 213.31 Texas Tech 413.15 6 Illinois 269.33
Total Offense 74 343.46 Tulsa 569.86 8 Penn St. 448.92
Scoring Offense 62 25.08 Oklahoma 51.14 6 Penn St. 38.92
Rushing Defense 67 142.46 TCU 47.08 7 Penn St. 93.23
Pass Efficiency Defense 37 115.76 Southern California 85.75 7 Iowa 98.32
Total Defense 58 355.85 TCU 217.77 7 Penn St. 280.08
Scoring Defense 41 22.08 Southern California 9.00 5 Iowa 13.00
Net Punting 71 34.37 Cincinnati 41.48 8 Michigan 39.34
Punt Returns 45 9.96 Central Mich. 20.50 4 Ohio St. 13.00
Kickoff Returns 94 19.73 Temple 26.60 8 Penn St. 24.54
Turnover Margin 49 .15 Oklahoma 1.64 5 Ohio St. 1.23
Pass Defense 69 213.38 Southern California 134.38 7 Purdue 183.25
Passing Efficiency 85 116.06 Oklahoma 176.24 8 Penn St. 145.35
Sacks 54 2.00 Texas 3.62 8 Illinois 2.67
Tackles For Loss 48 6.00 Mississippi 8.62 6 Illinois 7.00
Sacks Allowed 60 1.85 Air Force .38 4 Penn St. 1.00
T=tied at this ranking


PLAYER RANKINGS
Player must have played in 75% of team's games
Summary of the top 100 national leaders and top 25 conference leaders
15 categories ranked
 
Category Player National
Rank		 Actual National
Leader		 Actual Conf
Rank		 Big Ten
Conference Leader		 Actual
Rushing Javon Ringer 4 125.92 Brown (Connecticut) 160.23 2 Greene (Iowa) 142.31
Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) Brian Hoyer 93 111.51 Bradford (Oklahoma) 180.84 10 Pryor (Ohio St.) 146.50
Total Offense Brian Hoyer 80 177.69 Keenum (Houston) 403.15 6 Williams (Illinois) 324.33
  Javon Ringer   125.92    12   
Receptions Per Game Blair White   3.31 Fitzgerald (North Texas) 9.42 16 Decker (Minnesota) 7.00
  Mark Dell   3.27    17   
  B.J. Cunningham   3.15    20   
Receiving Yards Per Game Mark Dell 73 61.73 Collie (BYU) 118.31 5 Decker (Minnesota) 89.50
  Blair White   50.69    9   
  B.J. Cunningham   40.62    16   
Interceptions Otis Wiley T-40 .33 Berry (Tennessee) .58 T-3 Sash (Iowa) .42
  Chris L. Rucker   .18    15   
  Johnny Adams   .17    T-16   
  Dan Fortener   .15    T-23   
Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) Aaron Bates 30 41.96 Conley (Idaho) 47.43 4 Mesko (Michigan) 42.95
Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) Otis Wiley 35 10.38 Brown (Central Mich.) 20.50 4 Small (Ohio St.) 15.17
Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game)     Shelton (Temple) 31.30   Stoudermire (Minnesota) 25.79
Field Goals Brett Swenson T-4 1.69 Gano (Florida St.) 2.18 1 Swenson (Michigan St.) 1.69
Scoring Javon Ringer 1 10.15 Ringer (Michigan St.) 10.15 1 Ringer (Michigan St.) 10.15
  Brett Swenson 45 7.69    5   
All-Purpose Runners Javon Ringer 15 157.77 Maclin (Missouri) 202.36 1 Ringer (Michigan St.) 157.77
Sacks Trevor Anderson T-41 .62 Hughes (TCU) 1.15 6 Maybin (Penn St.) .92
  Brandon Long T-96 .42    12   
Tackles Greg Jones 17 9.77 Richardson (New Mexico St.) 12.45 3 Miller (Illinois) 11.00
  Eric Gordon   6.54    T-13   
  Otis Wiley   6.50    T-15   
Tackles For Loss Greg Jones T-62 1.08 Gilbert (San Jose St.) 1.83 9 Graham (Michigan) 1.82
  Trevor Anderson   .81    T-16   
T=tied at this ranking